Not In Our Name: We the People Respond To Australian Parliamentary Motion On Israel At 60

In response to PM Rudd’s Motion on Israel’s 60th Anniversary year, many Australians, including this blogger, supported and signed an advertisement that appeared prominently on page 7 of The Australian national broadsheet on Wednesday 12 March. The statement reads:

Not in Our Name

We, as informed and concerned Australians, choose to disassociate ourselves from a celebration of the triumph of racism and the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians since the al-Nakba (Catastrophe) of 1948. As we write, Israel continues to expand illegal Jewish-only settlements in the West Bank including Arab East Jerusalem.

Australia and Australians should not give the Israeli people and its leaders the impression that Australia supports them in their dispossession of the Palestinian people. Israel has poisoned our (the West’s) relations with the whole of the Arab and Muslim world. Rather than celebrating the creation of the State of Israel, we should be recognising the people of Palestine, those who were dispossessed, those who lived and died as refugees, those who continue to live and die and suffer at the hands of the State of Israel, and those who will continue to suffer and die in the future until justice is done.

nakba-advert-12-march-2008.jpg
Statement written by Paul Heywood-Smith QC for publication in The Australian newspaper on 12 March 2008 (Click on thumbnail for statement as it appeared in The Australian, with signatories. Click here for a better resolution — thanks Dave)

From 1948.com.au

Recommended Sites

Related Articles

See also
Alan Ramsey on Dissent Among Australian Federal MPs on Israel Motion

Advertisement
This entry was posted in Activism, Australia, Human Rights, Israel, Justice, Lobby watch, Media, Occupation, Palestine, Palestine Peace, Peace and Justice, Peace education, Speeches. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Not In Our Name: We the People Respond To Australian Parliamentary Motion On Israel At 60

  1. LDU says:

    Why is all this congratulating and condemning going on a few months early. It should all build up till May.

  2. Ann says:

    Good question, LDU. Could be the tactic is to get in early, milk it for all its worth. Rudd still hasn’t explained to colleague Julia Irwin just why he saw fit to deliver this motion.

  3. 99 says:

    Damn! I was having such high hopes for Rudd. :-(

  4. Pingback: links for 2008-03-17 « Israel’s 60th Birthday

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

Please log in to WordPress.com to post a comment to your blog.

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s