Warsaw Ghetto 1941, Gaza 2008

A short and succinct letter to the editor in today’s Sydney Morning Herald from Zaid Khan puts things into perspective:

Nearly 70 years ago, in a small eastern European city, an oppressed and occupied people were under siege, living under atrocious and brutal conditions, lacking food, medicine, electricity, water, and slowly being strangled in the hope they would just disappear.

Warsaw Ghetto 1941 – Gaza 2008. Israel, you are a disgrace.

Zaid Khan

What is to be done? Chances are that if you reading this, you already have a good grasp of what is happening. Also avail yourself to first hand accounts from residents in Gaza, such as Tabula Gaza, Raising Yousef–A Mother From Gaza and Dr Mona El Farra’s blog. Spread the word and discuss it with people who may not even know all this is happening or who may uncritically accept the Israeli neocon worldview propagated in some of the major media outlets. Israel is committing slow genocide and ethnic cleansing. A simple yet powerful letter like the one above can ricochet around the world.

Here are some other ways you can help: Read the rest of this entry »

On This Day in Peace History: the Greenham Common Women and other inspiring people power episodes

A very Happy New Year to you and yours. May 2008 be a good one for you personally and a more peaceful one for the world. We remember that these are sometimes quite politically grim times for a good slice of humanity.

Yet even in the axial Israel-Palestine conflict, most obviously a key focus here, there have been promising glimmers of action and initiatives throughout 2007. Mazin Qumsiyeh has assiduously listed many of them in his excellent mailing list newsletter (see below, after the fold, for a summary).*

More locally in Australia, John Howard was ousted both from government and from his own seat, and David Hicks has finally been released from the Guantanamo Bay gulag, and has just finished serving the remainder of his sentence in his home town. With some of the mainstream media here reporting on this atrociously, it bears remembering that there is absolutely no evidence that David Hicks actually committed any crime whatsoever. He admitted to the charge of “supporting terrorism” as the linchpin of a plea bargain, after years of effort to secure his release. Let’s hope the man is let be to recover something of his life, and all best wishes to him and his courageous father, Terry.

Some reminders of the unstoppable force of the human spirit might be a fitting last post for 2007. This Week in Peace History, published by Carl Bunin and edited by Al Frank, is an interesting and valuable compendium to which you can sign up to receive by email. It is designed to remind us that our agency counts, and to appreciate that we are indeed “part of a rich history advocating peace and social justice.” Read the rest of this entry »

From the Iraqi Resistance, video

UPDATED LINKS 

A compelling video reportedly from the Iraqi Resistance group 1920, inasmuch as anyone can vouch for the veracity of its provenance.

Entitled Hidden Facts, it is produced by the Media Bureau of the 1920 Revolution Brigades كتائب ثورة العشرين, the narration is in English and it runs for 16 minutes.

The video transcript follows after the fold (available here in English and Arabic). Video also available at YouTube: Part 1 and Part 2.

Read the rest of this entry »

Ban the Bomblets

From the Australian Dateline program, an excellent segment on cluster bombs that aired in April this year, with a focus on Lebanon.

Unexploded Israeli-launched bomblets continue to litter the Lebanese countryside and endanger playing children and farming families, responsible for the maiming and killing of dozens of civilians well after a conflict has formally ended.

The campaign to ban these insidious weapons everywhere is a most important and worthwhile one. The program follows the effort to ban these munitions internationally.

We recall that during last year’s abominable summer war, 90% of Israel’s cluster-bombs were launched just in the last 72 hours of the war, when, significantly, a ceasefire was known to be imminent.

That is, quite apart from their obviously immoral use, launching them made absolutely no military-strategic sense for Israel, either. The millions of cluster bombs from Israel are nothing more than a massive war crime. In the second video clip, Shimon Perez says they were a “mistake”.

Yet the Israeli government still refuses to provide international mine clearing teams and the Lebanese government with details of where the cluster bombs were fired, which would facilitate clearing operations.

Video segment intro:

Ten years ago, a committed bunch of international activists received the Nobel Peace Prize for their campaign to have land-mines banned worldwide. As a result of their efforts, close enough to three-quarters of the world has signed up to the ban. Now, these same people have their sights set on cluster bombs. And at the forefront of their effort is an Australian, John Rodsted, who these days pretty much devotes his entire life to ridding the world of these deadly weapons. David Brill recently travelled with Rodsted to southern Lebanon, where people are still dying from the cluster bombs rained down by the Israelis in the last days of that recent war.

Success! Bethlehem twins with local Sydney Council

The local Sydney council of Marrickville has now entered into a Sister City relationship with Bethlehem, occupied Palestinian city and birthplace of Christ.The Mayor of Bethlehem, Dr Victor Batarseh and a delegation from Bethlehem are currently in Sydney to seal the deal and it was a pleasure to help welcome them with Sydney’s Palestinian community and many others in the general Middle East community here. (Next campaign: twinning Hebron with Leichhardt –thanks Alex).

In addition to the links below, the excellent Coalition for Peace and Justice in Palestine (CJPP) Sydney has more on the Sister Cities campaign.

Relevant local links:

Bethlehem-specific and -related posts:

Organisations

Why are creating these people-to-people, community-to-community ties so important? They constitute direct links of friendship and solidarity and an opportunity to establish multiple cultural, civil and economic ties between towns that can often be independent of federal government policy.

And these exchanges are especially needed now. Bethlehem now has several — over 30 — such twinning arrangements around the world, in no small part due to its dedicated advocates impassioned about saving this beleaguered holy city. While Christians, Muslims and Jews have coexisted for centuries in Palestine, occupied Bethlehem is being subject to strangulation by the Israeli government: two thirds of the population in Bethlehem lives below the poverty line and unemployment is higher than 60%.

Last Christmas I noted the Mayor of Bethlehem’s words in his traditional Christmas season press conference, in which he said that

the birthplace of Jesus Christ is in its worst economic, political and tourist conditions in those 2,000 years. The dire situation is due to the procedures and practices of the occupation that continues to increase in severity in and around the city.

The so-called security fence on our land has forced large numbers of people to leave their homes and move. The conditions are so deplorable that the practices are clearly intended to vacate the land of its people. Read the rest of this entry »

Neocon Historical Revisionism Revisited: the Case of Iran

UPDATED with additional links

This image has already received a good airing in the blogosphere; following on the heels of Cheney’s near-sensible statements back in 1994 about the lunacy of invading and occupying Iraq, I thought it might be worthwhile to air again in service of a timely reminder about another Orwellian neoconservative policy backflip, this time on Iran and its national ambitions to go nuclear.

(NB. A colleague informed me the other day that former governor of Hong Kong Chris Patten had wryly observed that the prefix “neo” before a word might as well mean “not” in these times, particularly as they pertain to the terrible twins neocon and neoliberal. That is, neocons are really not true conservatives at all, neoliberals are really not genuine small ‘l’ liberals in the classical sense. I agree). See also this collection of newspaper articles and advertisements from the 1970s that clearly indicates European and US support for the Iranian nuclear program.

The above is an advertisement commissioned by US energy companies advocating nuclear energy for the US. It features the Shah of Iran Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, who was brought to power after 1953 after a CIA-supported coup ousted democratically-elected Prime Minister Mohammed Mossadegh. The Shah was in turn deposed with the 1979 Islamic Revolution.

The Iranian nuclear programme was launched with the active input of the US in the 1950s. Iran was urged to invest its oil profits in expensive US nuclear technology, on the rationale that Iran’s oil was a finite resource and going nuclear was an energy investment for the longer-term future. Read the rest of this entry »

Why Palestine Matters By Roger H. Lieberman

dc-rally-9-by-dgl.jpgThanks as well as a hat tip to the great ladies at Jordan Journals for making this article available. Unless you have a print subscription to the Jordan Times, this article is not freely available online (the only other site that has it requires subscription). [Bold emphasis is editorial]

Why Palestine Matters By Roger H. Lieberman
Jordan Times | 20 June 2007

In driving around central New Jersey of late, I have observed a great many signs on schools and houses of worship proclaiming the urgency of the humanitarian crisis in Darfur. This is perfectly right and natural. The deteriorating situation in that beleaguered region of western Sudan certainly deserves concern and assistance from people worldwide.

What is troubling, however, is how little concern seems evident, at similar venues, for a political and humanitarian crisis far older and far more attributable to US foreign policy — indeed made possible by American taxpayers. Where, among the schools, churches, synagogues and libraries of suburbia, are the expressions of grief and outrage over the Israeli occupation of Palestinian land?

Fifty-nine years after Israel was established by force on 78 per cent of Mandate Palestine, and 40 years after its armies occupied the remaining 22 per cent in the Six-Day War, the majority of Americans outside progressive and intellectual circles seem divided between those who are disturbingly apathetic about the conflict and those who blindly adhere to the Israeli narrative.

As long as this status quo persists, hopes for a just peace in the Holy Land will elude fulfilment.

What accounts for this baffling indifference or antipathy to basic Palestinian rights? Why, in God’s name, should the right of human beings to live in freedom and dignity in their native land be seen by any serious person as “controversial”? And why does the preponderance of US politicians, irrespective of their views on other matters, invariably adhere to the Zionist Party line when it comes to the Israel-Palestine conflict?

The usual explanation for this sad state of affairs is the inordinate influence of the pro-Israel lobby on American politics and media, and the fear of running afoul of its banal taboos. But this does not account for why such propaganda has consistently found so receptive an audience, and why such taboos are taken so seriously by so many people.

Verily, America’s abject failure to support the fulfilment of Palestinian aspirations for freedom derives from the curious fact that Israel’s ideological milieu found early on a receptive audience, for rather different reasons, at both ends of the American political mainstream. As a result, many ordinary Americans, both Christian and Jewish, have grown up and lived much of their lives believing that Israel somehow embodies the values, liberal or conservative, they admire in the United States. But this is a fabrication, and recognising that Israel’s behaviour conforms to no healthy manifestation of American ideals is essential for the constructive reformation of US Middle East policy.

Liberals have consistently maintained their support for Israel on the premise that it is a “democracy”, in contrast to the supposedly intractable “dictatorial” nature of “Arab regimes”. While seemingly accurate in describing the status quo inside Israel’s pre-1967 borders, this conception ignores the ugly reality that Israeli “democracy” has, from day one, been subordinated to religious and ethnic chauvinism. Israel, according to long-standing Zionist precepts, can only function democratically by maintaining an overwhelming Jewish majority in the country.

From this policy stemmed the mass-expulsion of Palestinian Muslims and Christians in 1948, and the denial of the right of return and restitution to them and their descendants ever since. It further entailed the imposition of martial law over the remaining “Israeli Arabs” until 1966, and their marginalisation as second-class citizens to the present day. Finally, it inspired the aggressive confiscation of erstwhile Palestinian lands by the Israeli state, and an all-consuming quest for Jewish immigrants from every conceivable source — lately going so far as to include obscure tribes from the Himalayas and South America who only recently adopted the Jewish faith. Such policies bear scant resemblance to the ideals of America’s Founding Fathers, but do recall the Old World tyrannies they so despised — as well as totalitarian states of more recent times.

American rightists, for their part, have tended to extol Israel as a model of “pioneer” achievement and as a vanguard of “Western civilisation” battling “barbarism” and “backwardness”. This boilerplate rhetoric derives largely from fundamentalist Protestant dogma about “manifest destiny” that figured prominently in American culture during the settlement of the western frontier in the 19th Century. It attempts to cast Palestinians in a role equivalent to the Native American tribes who were “swept aside” to “make way” for “progress” in the days of the Gold Rush, the Cattle Boom and the Trans-Continental Railroad.

Although no one should trivialise the wrongs done to Native Americans during the westwards expansion of the United States, only a rudimentary knowledge of Palestinian life in the centuries prior to the advent of Zionism is necessary to understand that such comparisons are ludicrous in the extreme. While few indigenous peoples north of Mexico had advanced beyond a Neolithic, or even Mesolithic, cultural stage by the time Europeans arrived, Palestinians had maintained for centuries a sophisticated economy and culture based on agriculture and vibrant mercantile traditions. Palestine remained throughout the Mediaeval and Ottoman periods a crossroads of Asia, Europe and Africa, supporting important religious and scholarly institutions of Muslim, Christian and Jewish affiliation.

Far from being an “empty land” awaiting settlers to “make the desert bloom”, pre-Zionist Palestine was a land full of its own possibilities, blessed by enterprising people with high hopes for the future. Indeed, no one in recent times has done quite so effective a job in making the Holy Land barren and deprived of a promising future as the Israeli occupation forces with their bewildering, Kafkaesque matrix of closures, walls and checkpoints.

Read the rest of this entry »

News ‘n Views: Some Current Pickings

press-picks-red.jpgSome time-pressed recent links I found of interest rather than write-up(s) as I take some time out.

Like many people, I have experimented with social bookmarking sites (Reddit, Newsvine, Clipmarks, Delicious, Digg etc) that are very useful in collecting and organising your bookmarked links, though they do seem to be predicated upon the links being permanently live — if you also use primary news sources such as press agencies (Reuters, AP), you’ll know that often valuable articles are not archived and URL links lapse.

So a year ago, I started up a group-list, commonly used for notification and/ or as fora for discussion, simply for the purposes of archiving articles. The articles are all full-text contemporary political pieces I find valuable and/or interesting and send to the list where they can be archived and accessed anytime, anywhere, by members. My fellow members are free to add to and access articles in this shared archive. I’m going to open it up for subscription for a short time for those who may be interested in the types of issues Peoples Geography covers. As it can be a high volume list, I encourage people to choose the Daily Digest or No Email option which I myself choose (lets you access all articles online rather than receiving them individually by email online). Click here if you happen to be interested in joining. Read the rest of this entry »

Johan Galtung: Conflict and Civilisation

Thanks to Agent 99 for pointing out the updated link, the first location of which had lapsed (also updated on audio page). I’ve taken the opportunity to upload this talk again by Johan Galtung which I attended last year. His hybrid-but-mostly-Norwegian accent may make him sound like Inspector Clousseau as our friend notes, but his reflections are always worthwhile and enriching. (RT 81 m)

Galtung talks about enacting a positive peace through meaningful dialogue, about spiritual syncretism and an alliance of civilisations, with reference to the Danish cartoon controversy and other topical conflicts. This elder spokesman and founder of peace studies delivered this address at the Brisbane Festival of Ideas on the 31 March 2006.

Original .mp3 url

Relevant links:

Further links: Conflict transformation

June 2007, hopeful movement towards justice

palsolidarity_button.pngUPDATED

As the British academics UCU boycott bites (coming after UK union boycott calls from doctors, architects as well the National Union of Journalists in the last twelve weeks alone), this month has also notably seen historic worldwide rallies calling for justice and an end to the military occupation of Palestine by Israel, including in Washington and Palestine and Israel itself.

Washington Rally: click on thumbnails for full size. Images from photographer Diane Greene Lent

dc-rally-1-by-dgl.jpgdc-rally-2-by-dgl.jpgdc-rally-3-by-dgl.jpgdc-rally-4-by-dgl.jpgdc-rally-5-by-dgl.jpgdc-rally-6-by-dgl.jpgdc-rally-8-by-dgl.jpgdc-rally-7-by-dgl.jpg

dc-rally-9-by-dgl.jpg

It may well be that June 2007 is a hinge of history in this long running injustice, as we see unprecedented scrutiny, historical correctives and reflections on the occupation, significance of the 1967 war and the Israeli attack on the USS Liberty.

masaryk-sq-fountain.jpgdizzengof-square.jpg

Masaryk Square (L) and Dizzengof fountains in Tel Aviv, where protesters added red paint to represent “the blood of the thousands who were killed and the tens of thousands who were injured throughout the long years of occupation”. The leaflet they distributed also invited Tel Aviv residents to dip their hands in the reddened water and “realize that these hands, which appear clean, are also stained with the blood of the occupied and the oppressed.”

I first posted this determinedly upbeat entry a few hours ago unaware of the most recent escalations of US- and Israeli government facilitated factional violence in the OPT, about which I have written previously (see Divide and Conquer; to which I’ve not much to add right now). We need to be reminded of successes to sustain hope and keep us going, too. Drying up in despair doesn’t help anybody much.

It is true one can not be too Pollyanna-ish — Israel continues its illegal settlements and its divide and rule starvation of the Palestinians. In the US, the neocons have arguably been at their apogee and the Israel Lobby assured of an AIPAC-beholden Presidency and Congress.

But the disastrous occupation quagmire of Iraq and the craven betrayal of the Congressional Democrats on the critical issues of US withdrawal and war de-funding has at least further exposed the charade to more people, as reflected in various polls. The scurrilous attacks on Norman Finkelstein has also laid bare the desperation of the Israel Lobby and revealed the extraordinary lengths to which such members as Alan Dershowitz are driven to go to smear and slander challengers.

In some of the good news: the EU has resumed direct aid, and many prominent international figures have been moved to speak up for Palestine and argue for sanctions. South African Ronnie Kasrils and British doctor Colin Green, for example, cogently make the case for boycotting apartheid and supporting justice (excerpts after the ‘More’ break).

In Israel, some of the children of the high-profile Zionist founders of the state of Israel have turned their backs on this legacy, including the grandson of the right-wing PM Menachem Begin, 32 year-old Avinadav Begin, seen regularly protesting at the West Bank side of the Apartheid Wall over the past few years.

In a recent post entitled Scions of Zion Turn Against Their Fathers, Richard Silverstein has noted how three prominent progeny of Zionist pioneer Askenazi right wing establishment families have disavowed their political inheritance and spurned the zionist zeal of their parentage. In addition to Menachem Begin’s grandson, an anarchist activist peace protester at Bi’ilin regularly for the past two and a half years as mentioned, we also have no less than the Irgun-steeped Ehud Olmert’s daughter Dana attending a rally during the Lebanon war.

As well, Avrum Burg, a former Knesset speaker, Shimon Peres protégé, and Israel Agency director has just had his bombshell book released, Defeating Hitler, and left the country to take up French citizenship. While the book is not yet available in English, it is by all accounts a trenchant and hard-hitting critique of contemporary Israel and the whole Zionist enterprise.

In a review and interview with his friend Burg, Ari Shavit writes: The Israel of Defeating Hitler is a very harsh place. Brutal and imperialist, confrontational and insular. A shallow place, thuggish, lacking spiritual inspiration.”

In the interview he asks Burg: Does this mean that you no longer find the notion of a Jewish state acceptable? to which Burg replies:

“It can’t work anymore. To define the State of Israel as a Jewish state is the key to its end. A Jewish state is explosive. It’s dynamite.” He is favour of abrogating the Law of Return, compares Israel to Germany and urges Israelis to obtain foreign passports (worth reading in full: Leaving the Zionist Ghetto + Part Two)

otherzionists.gifFor Burg then, a progressive zionism does not seem possible and he has broken ranks. Progressive Zionists do have within their ranks genuine peacemakers in the Uri Avnery tradition (see also ‘The Other Zionists’ documentary) who may yet effect some reform from within.

In the US, individuals who I don’t think would mind this characterisation include Richard Silverstein. Richard has recently come under some attack from vitriolic, rabid cyber-bullies and experienced some smear himself. As with Finkelstein, I offer my sympathies, and can not help but notice how much more shrill these voices are becoming. Our political positions certainly diverge, but that does not preclude seeking and finding common ground — I recognize Richard as a sincere bridge-builder in the I-P conflict who genuinely does want peace and justice. Whether it can be done within zionism or not remains to be seen.

Read the rest of this entry »