<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who&#8217;s To Blame For The Price Of Oil? Speculators, not Saudis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://peoplesgeography.com/2008/06/28/the-price-of-oil-speculators-not-saudis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://peoplesgeography.com/2008/06/28/the-price-of-oil-speculators-not-saudis/</link>
	<description>Creating people&#039;s geographies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 19:27:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: peoplesgeography</title>
		<link>http://peoplesgeography.com/2008/06/28/the-price-of-oil-speculators-not-saudis/#comment-44645</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[peoplesgeography]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 13:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoplesgeography.wordpress.com/?p=4773#comment-44645</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes I did replace it and I inserted a comment thanking you for prompting the clarification, in which I also inserted your comment. Unfortunately I was revising it in two windows and closed the tab in which I had done so when I revised the comment. I&#039;ll reproduce it as best as I can:

Emmanuel has just written:

&lt;blockquote&gt;I&#039;m curious - why is it Anglo-American &lt;i&gt;Judean&lt;/I&gt; and not Anglo-American &lt;i&gt;Israeli&lt;/i&gt; or &lt;i&gt;Zionist&lt;/i&gt;? Judean sounds connected to ancient Judea (if it were a reference to the religion it would be Jewish, not Judean), as if you suddenly accept the historical connection of the Jewish people to the land.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Simple slip of the tongue, no special reason. Its not even because that&#039;s how some Israelis would wish to be seen.  I&#039;ve replaced it with Israeli.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes I did replace it and I inserted a comment thanking you for prompting the clarification, in which I also inserted your comment. Unfortunately I was revising it in two windows and closed the tab in which I had done so when I revised the comment. I&#8217;ll reproduce it as best as I can:</p>
<p>Emmanuel has just written:</p>
<blockquote><p>I&#8217;m curious &#8211; why is it Anglo-American <i>Judean</i> and not Anglo-American <i>Israeli</i> or <i>Zionist</i>? Judean sounds connected to ancient Judea (if it were a reference to the religion it would be Jewish, not Judean), as if you suddenly accept the historical connection of the Jewish people to the land.</p></blockquote>
<p>Simple slip of the tongue, no special reason. Its not even because that&#8217;s how some Israelis would wish to be seen.  I&#8217;ve replaced it with Israeli.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emmanuel</title>
		<link>http://peoplesgeography.com/2008/06/28/the-price-of-oil-speculators-not-saudis/#comment-44644</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Emmanuel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 13:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoplesgeography.wordpress.com/?p=4773#comment-44644</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I see you replaced Judean with Israeli in the new phrase &quot;Anglo-American Judean regime axis of terror&quot; following my previous (unpublished) comment. I&#039;m still curious why you originally chose the word Judean (I&#039;m not accusing you of anti-Semitism or Judeophobia - I&#039;m just plane curious).

As I said before, USrael or Bushmert are much more catchy than Anglo-American Israeli axis of terror. It&#039;s too long. Maybe you should use an acronym like AAIAT?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see you replaced Judean with Israeli in the new phrase &#8220;Anglo-American Judean regime axis of terror&#8221; following my previous (unpublished) comment. I&#8217;m still curious why you originally chose the word Judean (I&#8217;m not accusing you of anti-Semitism or Judeophobia &#8211; I&#8217;m just plane curious).</p>
<p>As I said before, USrael or Bushmert are much more catchy than Anglo-American Israeli axis of terror. It&#8217;s too long. Maybe you should use an acronym like AAIAT?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peoplesgeography</title>
		<link>http://peoplesgeography.com/2008/06/28/the-price-of-oil-speculators-not-saudis/#comment-44632</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[peoplesgeography]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 12:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoplesgeography.wordpress.com/?p=4773#comment-44632</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So the increasing cost of imperial military misadventures is to blame for a large part of the oil price rise, in addition to speculation. We should be squarely blaming the western war criminals (the Anglo-American Israeli regime axis of terror), then. Well described, thanks for that.

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So the increasing cost of imperial military misadventures is to blame for a large part of the oil price rise, in addition to speculation. We should be squarely blaming the western war criminals (the Anglo-American Israeli regime axis of terror), then. Well described, thanks for that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

