Absolutely so! :)

-Jack

Yes, the cover of war has been used as an excuse for many nefarious deeds, but in any civilised society it does not and should not mean the suspension of human rights. There are international laws and norms governing conduct in war. Here is a link to the Geneva Conventions which protect civilians. Combatants too have rights. Does war mean that we give up all norms of civilised conduct? Is that not a negation and abrogation of all that we claim to fight for?

With regard to Iran, yes I do support Iran’s right to nuclear energy (countries such as France currently source over 60% of their energy from nuclear sources). Iran sees the double standards and denial of legitimate development of its country — does it not have a right to this?

My position on nukes is that I am decidedly not in support of their continued development (let alone use!) but that there are no sufficient grounds for other powers wishing to deny Iran nuclear weapons. The development of a “nuclear club” after the American and Russian nuclear arms race, i.e. China, India, Pakistan, North Korea etc shows that they provide some leverage against aggression by the world’s sole hyperpower.

I disagree with the imposition of sanctions here and with the unequal and undemocratic composition of the UN Security Council (USA, Russia, China, UK, France). I think the UNSC is anachronistic and in need of overdue reform, as do many others! The UN system, which I support, is open to abuse; I think the way forward is to strengthen it so as to represent the international community rather than simply the sectional interests of the current US administration.

Your thoughts?

- Ann

I will say, that if nothing was learned in Iraq it should be caution on the United States and Britains part.

Btw, what are your thoughts of Iran and its intent to enrich uranium. Do you think that it is just for energy or do you believe they want nuclear weapons? Do you agree with the U.N. sanctions?

Take care,

-Jack